For information on and to subscribe to Ari's FREE e-mail newsletter, click on the button below.

E-mail newsletter

More about Ari Cowan:
Facebook
Facebook
Blog - Pax Principia
Pax Principia Blog
DoPeace
DoPeace
Compassionate Action Network
Compassionate Action Network

 

Firefox 3

This site is best viewed using
the Firefox web browser.
You may download your free copy by clicking on the button above.

 

The PAR ModelComparing Models

Previous
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Next

 

“I heartily support and endorse your continuing
efforts to improve the safety and well-being
of the people of the State of Washington.”

— Representative Roger Goodman.

Washington State Legislature

 

Comparing the Punitive Model with the
Violence Integrative Prevention and Restoration (PAR) Model

The table below illustrates key concepts and components of violence and the way in which two different models for describing and responding to violence deal with each of these concepts and components.

The two models are: 1) the traditional “punitive” model and 2) the new “Violence Integrative Prevention and Restoration (PAR) Model" developed by Ari Cowan.

Concept/Component Traditional Punitive Model New PAR Model
1. Historic application Common forms of the model have been used for thousands of years New model
2. Foundation Fear based (removal of perpetrator’s power and control) Power based (reestablishing healthy power and control for all stakeholders)
3. Nature of violence A moral and legal issue. A health issue
4. Definition of violence Vague, varied Precise — differentiated from injurious (which may not be violent). Established criteria for qualifying as violence
5. Orientation/focus Protection oriented Solution oriented
6. Response objective Punishment Prevention and restoration
7. Moral valuation Violence is seen as “bad” Violence is seen as unhealthy
8. Acts of violence are… Single events The extreme manifestation of a continuum of events
9. Responsibility for violent acts Perpetrator only Perpetrator, contributors, supportive systems, and environmental conditions
10. Perpetrator seen as… The villain A key stakeholder in diagnosis, treatment, restoration process
Top
11. Violence occurs in… Physical body, occasionally the emotional body Physical, emotional, mental, environmental, and spiritual bodies
12. Preventive approach Fear, aversion-based (threat of sanctions — economic to incarceration to death). May require temporary or permanent time in prison Identification and reduction of risk factors, preemptive intervention, and redirection of power and control. May require temporary or permanent quarantine
13. Response approach Punitive — characterized by punishment, righteousness, scapegoating, revenge, retribution Public health approach — characterized by restoration (making whole) of all involved in the violence continuum
14. Intervention methods Interpersonal — identification, apprehension, adjudication, incarceration. International — economic sanctions, war Diagnosis and application of response protocols (interpersonal and international)
15. Language used Personal negative descriptors — derogatory, demeaning, humiliating, condemning, depreciatory, critical, etc. Behavior descriptors — vectors of transmission, infection rates, toxicity, trauma, addictive qualities, risk factors, etc.
16. Structural approach “Drama triangle” — victim (to protect), persecutor (to apprehend), rescuer (to suppress and punish persecutor) Public health approach — assessment, treatment protocol design, application of protocols, evaluation. Focus on accountability, restoration
17. Acceptance of violence Depends upon context — criminal violence not accepted, sanctioned violence approved All acts of violence require a response and treatment
18. The role sanctioned violence plays Considered a legitimate strategy for preventing and responding to violence Not considered a legitimate response — sanctioned violence most commonly aggravates the condition and can drive the growth and continuation of the malignancy
19. Application areas Law enforcement, corrections, international relations Education, healthcare, mental health, law enforcement, corrections, international relations
20. Effect upon resiliency Erodes resiliency Builds resiliency
21. Impact on management Reduces management to punitive action Makes violence understandable; provides a context and structure for increasing effectiveness in preventing and responding to violence

 

 

Previous
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Next

Top

 
Copyright © 2010 by Spiritridge Institute, LLC
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

 

Go to the home page