The table below illustrates key concepts and components of violence and the way in which two different models for describing and responding to violence deal with each of these concepts and components.
The two models are: 1) the traditional “punitive” model and 2) the new “Violence Integrative Prevention and Restoration (PAR) Model" developed by Ari Cowan.
| Concept/Component |
Traditional Punitive Model |
New PAR Model |
| 1. |
Historic application |
Common forms of the model have been used for thousands of years |
New model |
| 2. |
Foundation |
Fear based (removal of perpetrator’s power and control) |
Power based (reestablishing healthy power and control for all stakeholders) |
| 3. |
Nature of violence |
A moral and legal issue. |
A health issue |
| 4. |
Definition of violence |
Vague, varied |
Precise — differentiated from injurious (which may not be violent). Established criteria for qualifying as violence |
| 5. |
Orientation/focus |
Protection oriented |
Solution oriented |
| 6. |
Response objective |
Punishment |
Prevention and restoration |
| 7. |
Moral valuation |
Violence is seen as “bad” |
Violence is seen as unhealthy |
| 8. |
Acts of violence are… |
Single events |
The extreme manifestation of a continuum of events |
| 9. |
Responsibility for violent acts |
Perpetrator only |
Perpetrator, contributors, supportive systems, and environmental conditions |
| 10. |
Perpetrator seen as… |
The villain |
A key stakeholder in diagnosis, treatment, restoration process |
 |
| 11. |
Violence occurs in… |
Physical body, occasionally the emotional body |
Physical, emotional, mental, environmental, and spiritual bodies |
| 12. |
Preventive approach |
Fear, aversion-based (threat of sanctions — economic to incarceration to death). May require temporary or permanent time in prison |
Identification and reduction of risk factors, preemptive intervention, and redirection of power and control. May require temporary or permanent quarantine |
| 13. |
Response approach |
Punitive — characterized by punishment, righteousness, scapegoating, revenge, retribution |
Public health approach — characterized by restoration (making whole) of all involved in the violence continuum |
| 14. |
Intervention methods |
Interpersonal — identification, apprehension, adjudication, incarceration. International — economic sanctions, war |
Diagnosis and application of response protocols (interpersonal and international) |
| 15. |
Language used |
Personal negative descriptors — derogatory, demeaning, humiliating, condemning, depreciatory, critical, etc. |
Behavior descriptors — vectors of transmission, infection rates, toxicity, trauma, addictive qualities, risk factors, etc. |
| 16. |
Structural approach |
“Drama triangle” — victim (to protect), persecutor (to apprehend), rescuer (to suppress and punish persecutor) |
Public health approach — assessment, treatment protocol design, application of protocols, evaluation. Focus on accountability, restoration |
| 17. |
Acceptance of violence |
Depends upon context — criminal violence not accepted, sanctioned violence approved |
All acts of violence require a response and treatment |
| 18. |
The role sanctioned violence plays |
Considered a legitimate strategy for preventing and responding to violence |
Not considered a legitimate response — sanctioned violence most commonly aggravates the condition and can drive the growth and continuation of the malignancy |
| 19. |
Application areas |
Law enforcement, corrections, international relations |
Education, healthcare, mental health, law enforcement, corrections, international relations |
| 20. |
Effect upon resiliency |
Erodes resiliency |
Builds resiliency |
| 21. |
Impact on management |
Reduces management to punitive action |
Makes violence understandable; provides a context and structure for increasing effectiveness in preventing and responding to violence |